Nothing's Wrong With Trying How much is a human life worth when compared to an animals? Would it even be comparable?
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Get Access Animal testing: Essay Sample The writer of the article on http: Experiments on living animals are leading medicine further and further from the real cure Because animals react to both diseases and medications differently from humans they should not be used Animal research has not aided in the fight against any major disease There is no connection between animal testing and human health A totally new approach is needed instead of animal testing Experiments on animals are leading medicine further and further from the real cure The writer begins his article with a quote in which it is stated that animal testing brings humans further away from the truth.
The quote also points out that the writer does not know of an instance in which medical science and animal testing has helped save human lives. I, however, retaliate against such a comment because both medical science and animal testing have brought about a lot for us humans.
With the advent of genetic engineering technology, genetically modified mice can be generated to order and can provide models for a range of human diseases.
Mice are also used in place of other animals because they reproduce quickly and are cheap to maintain, therefore only minimal damage is done Furthermore, most countries have a law which states that a medicine must be administered to at least two large animals such as dogs before humans can use it.
Because these viruses react in similar ways to the human form of AIDS, scientists conduct their experiments on the monkeys and observe how the monkeys react to different medications.
Overall, this method is much better than conducting HIV experiments on humans. There is no connection between animal testing and the human health The writer states that there is no general connection between animal testing and human health. I, however, do not agree with this point because at an earlier point in the article, the writer states that there are scientific merits to animal testing, he also states that insulin was discovered only through animal testing.
Therefore, the writer can be seen to contradict himself. This shows that that the writer is uncertain and that he does not fully agree with his own point. Alternatives to animal testing should be used The writer states that if any advance is to be made, a totally new approach is required.
He states that human medicine should not be dependent on veternary medicine because it is dangerous and fraudulent to apply data from one species to another, different species. Although this point is true, I can not agree with it because there is no alternative to animal testing which is as good and efficient as animal testing.
Furthermore, the writer fails to list any alternatives which he thinks is acceptable. This can be due to him not believing in an alternative, or it can be due to weak beliefs or inadecuate research.
More essays like this:Animal rights advocates want government agencies to impose heavy restrictions on animal research, but their opposition of painful animal experimentation is matched by the growing concern that these restrictions would pose a threat to scientific progress. - Animal Testing Using Animals for testing is wrong and should be banned.
They should be entitled to the rights we have. Every day humans are using defenseless animals for cruel and most often useless tests. The animals cannot fight for themselves therefore we must.
There should be stronger laws to protect them from laboratory experiments. Argumentative Essay Animal Testing; Argumentative Essay Animal Testing. Animal experimentation is a procedure whereby non-animals are tested and used to develop treatments, check the safety of products for human use, and other commercial and biomedical uses (Woods 24).
Animal testing is wrong and unethical and alternative methods exist. However, many people believe that animal testing is justified because the animals are sacrificed to make products safer for human use and consumption.
The problem with this reasoning is that the animals' safety, well-being, and quality of life is . Animal Testing is wrong and cruel essays Animal testing is wrong and it is cruelty to animals.
Each year about five million dogs, cats, rabbits, rats, monkeys, and other animals die in lethal dose tests performed in many states around the United States.
Testing on Animals is Morally Wrong In today’s world, large corporations seem to have decided that animal testing is an acceptable way to produce products that are safe for human use at the expense of innocent animals everywhere.